Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Bacon's Rebellion

Bacon's Rebellion took place in 1676 in Virginia Colony. The leader of the rebellion was Nathaniel Bacon, a wealthy tobacco planter. Why did he rebel? Was not the fact that his last name evokes the image of smoky crispy strips of goodness good enough for him?

I'm glad you asked. As a matter of fact, I'm here to help y'all find out.

Colonial times in all their fancy-coat-and-hat glory.

Virginia Colony was going through some tough times. Tobacco prices had sunk, and the colony faced competition from the Carolinas and Maryland. On top of that, England had barred trade with France for them, so they lost a whole market. Bad weather didn't help either.

When some Native Americans lead a mini-raid on someone's plantation, the Virginians decided to use them as a scapegoat for their troubles. A series of raids and violence went back and forth on either side, so Governor Berkley decided to pursue a policy of containment of the threat, and just build a bunch of forts. Settlers in the back-country questioned this plan's effectiveness, and many thought it was just an excuse to raise taxes. People didn't like Berkley much, and also accused him of appointing his friends to high government offices. Bacon lead some raids against the Native Americans, (even killing friendly groups), and was elected to the House of Burgesses for his efforts.

Nathaniel Bacon himself. 

Governor Berkley convened the HoB and when Bacon came, tried to have him arrested. This failed, and Bacon gathered his followers and coerced Berkley into allowing him continue his raids on Native Americans. Berkley agreed, and fled Jamestown to go raise a militia since Bacon had sort of taken over the Colony for a bit. Bacon died suddenly, and his rebellion collapsed without his leadership. Berkley came back to assume command, but was recalled to England (much to the delight of Virginia.)

Defending against Native Americans, although the colonists may have started this one...

Many joined Bacon's cause against Berkley and the Native Americans, including both black and white indentured servants. The economic situation hadn't been kind to them either, so they joined in the rebellion. For upper-class Virginians, seeing the indentured servants ban together and rebel was frightening, and what was especially frightening was the fact that they were black and white joined together.

This caused Virginia colony to start relying more on slave labor and being tougher on African-Americans, free or slave. Since indentured servants were unreliable in times like these (and because they were racist and didn't like blacks and whites joining together), Virginia decided it needed a safe, more permanent lower class of person. to work for them.

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

The French and Indian War - Proclamation of 1763

The name "French and Indian War" (is the name for the part of the Seven Year's War that happened in North America. (The Seven Year's War was a European thing, although parts of it took place overseas, mostly in colonized areas.) Calling it the French and Indian War may be deceiving, since the French and (many of) the Native Americans actually fought on the same side against Great Britain, and not against each other as it may sound. On top of that, the Seven Year's War actually lasted for 9 years; 1754-1763. You love that, don't you?



In North America, the whole thing got started because Europe was still feverishly trying to colonize, or at least expand and maintain power. Now France had laid claim to the Mississippi watershed area as well as the Ohio Valley and the Great Lakes region, and had some forts and trading activity with the Native Americans going on. As time passed, the British colonies grew more prosperous, and people wanted to move out west over the Appalachian Mountains and set up shop in the rich Ohio Valley lands. The French weren't too happy with this British encroachments on "their" land, so they started building a string of forts to keep guard. Then, Britain built a couple of forts too; one in Oswego and the other in Halifax. (Oswego had started out a trading post below Lake Ontario, but was expanded to become a fort.)

British and French representatives met in Paris soon after, but no progress on the "who exactly has rights to the Ohio Valley, since the Native Americans obviously don't count" question was made. After that, France decided to just settle the situation by building even more forts even closer to British colonial soil, this time in Western Pennsylvania. At the same time, the governor of Virginia decided to start granting land in the Ohio Valley to Virginia citizens. To add to the trouble, a one George Washington decided to advise Britain to build a fort in a particularly nice location in the Ohio Valley, and so they did. Long story short, France captured it before it was finished, completed construction, and took it for their own. Washington then attacked the French, but he lost when re-enforcements came. Fort-wars then ensued for a while, until Britain finally decided it would be a good time to officially declare war in 1756.



The Native Americans (except the Iroquois Confederacy, who fought with Britain alongside some other tribes) sided with the French. France had a far more inclusive society in North America, and the Native Americans received less-meddling in their affairs on the part of France, and more friendliness and intermingling. The Native Americans would trade with the French, and fur trappers would actually bother to learn their languages, and sometimes even decided to marry the Native Americans too. In British society, things were decidedly less "chill;" they had an exclusive society. Things were more hostile, racist, and not as fair business wise with Native American-British relations, so understandably, most Native Americans decided to join France against Great Britain.

The war goes on, and Great Britain wins. The Native Americans aren't too happy, France gets kicked out of North America entirely, and ends up left with two small sugar islands. (Over Canada and the Ohio Valley, France decides to keep the sugar islands; this = importance of mercantilism!) Great Britain decides to raise the prices of goods sold to the Native Americans, and stops paying them for using forts on their land. They also stop giving exchanging gifts, which was an important and symbolic custom for the Native Americans, and they probably felt pretty offended that Britain just decided to stop it.



The Native Americans weren't feeling all that amiable towards the British, and when the prophet Neolin from a tribe in Delaware started preaching through ought the Great Lakes against materialism/alcohol/the English way of life, things didn't go well. On top of that, colonists had started to push further into Native American lands. The Ottawa war chief Pontiac, around the same time as Neolin was preaching, started a rebellion against the British and attacked colonists in the Ohio Valley; this was Pontiac's Rebellion (1763.) In response/anger, a group of colonists called the Paxton Boys in Western Pennsylvania attacked a peaceful group of Native Americans nearby and massacred them; partly out of racism and partly because they thought their government wasn't doing much to help them. Benjamin Franklin helped put an end to the killing by negotiating with the group, and was scathingly critical about their inhumane actions. Eventually, Great Britain decided to step in to end Pontiac's Rebellion, and did so, with the help of germ warfare in the form of smallpox infected blankets.

To ensure that something like that wouldn't happen again, the British government issued the Proclamation of 1763, which forbade settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. This was an attempt to keep colonists out of the Ohio Valley, and out of trouble with the Native Americans. Colonists pretty much disregarded it, and moved westward anyways, angry at the British for placing this restriction on them. This was one of the first 'restrictive acts' that the British took against the colonists, and one that they became more resented for.



At the end of the French and Indian War, many British soldiers stayed in North America. Tensions increased between the colonists and the soldiers. Many colonists became disgusted/displeased with the behavior/attitudes/appearances of the soldiers, and felt that they had a more separate identity from them. The colonists also felt that Britain had under-appreciated the part that they had played in the fighting the war. During this time, a sense of common identity, separate from that of the British, became stronger, as well as resentment against Britain that would grow in the future. 

The Conflict of Slavery

After having been traded for food and supplies, the first slaves arrived in 1619 in Virginia Colony. The Congressional government (when it finally came into being) would not regulate slavery until 1787 with the Northwest Ordinance. Before then, slave policy had been regulated by individual colonies, like Georgia and Virginia. The Northwest Ordinance created the Northwest Territories in the Ohio River Valley + the Great Lakes area. It also banned slavery there, becoming the first act of the US government against slavery. (However, indentured servitude was still legal, and some people illegally kept their slaves anyways.)

Slaves working in Virginia Colony

In 1803, the Louisiana Purchase was acquired by president Thomas Jefferson. This addition more than doubled the size of the United States, and people eagerly began moving westward. People migrated mostly along horizontal lines; this meant that people from the South would move into western regions still in the southern part of the country, and people from the North moved into regions in the northern part of the country. By 1819, all the Northern states (thus far) had abolished slavery, but not so in the South. Thus as Southerners moved westward in search of new land, they carried slavery with them.

Butter yellow color is Louisiana Purchase, peachy-tan is the color of the USA before that. 
Darker hot chocolate brown belongs to other countries, like Spain and UK.

The Southern economy was highly agricultural, while the North's was working its way to becoming the industrial powerhouse of the nation. With the invention of the cotton gin by Eli Whitney and its introduction into the market in the late 1790's,  cotton production because easier and cheaper. Since the crop was so profitable, the South started devoting more land to cotton, and brought over more slaves from Africa to pick it. As time went on, the South built a society structured on the plantation system that was highly dependent on agriculture, and the existence of slavery. The North becomes industrialized, and slavery is thrown out the window. Abolitionism grew out of the North, and would begin to pose a threat to the Southern system as time went on.
Slave traders loading slaves into harsh and cruel ships
In 1807, Congress abolishes US involvement in the international slave trade. Around this time, and even before and after it, states with large slave populations (like South Carolina) would make increasingly harsh and restrictive rules against slaves and black people. They felt threatened by the closing of the international slave trade for the US, and by slave rebellions in the US, as well as a successful one in Haiti where the slaves rose up and killed the French, and essentially kicked them out and formed their own country.


In 1819, Missouri was to become a state. Since there was an equal number of slave states and free states, people from both sides each wanted Missouri to have a slavery policy that would fit their ideas, so that they could have more power in Congress. The South was a minority in the House of Representatives, so they wanted to protect their power in the Senate. They also wanted to protect their way of life, and felt that since slaves were their legal property, Congress couldn't and shouldn't make laws against that. Northerners and abolitionists disagreed and wanted Missouri to be a free state.  Maine was also in line to become a state during this time.

The Missouri issue caused much controversy and friction between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise was made to remedy it. Key in this compromise was the representative from Kentucky in the HoR (and later the Senate), Henry Clay. In this compromise, Missouri would be a slave state and Maine would be a free state. It also forbade any slavery anywhere in the USA above the 36th parallel, except at Missouri of course.

 Picture unrelated.

Over the next twenty years, the South increased its reliance on agricultural, cotton, and slave labor. As abolitionism and anti-expansion of slavery feelings grew in the North, they felt increasingly on edge and more anxious to protect slavery, which they called the "peculiar institution." From 1836 - 1844, supporters of slavery had various gag rules put into action in Congress. These rules prevented/hindered the discussion of slavery in Congress. This was done partly out of a fear that slavery would be threatened and weakened, and partly also because people thought that Congress wouldn't get anything done if they got into an endless argument about slavery. Tensions were mounting, and there was a lot of friction between Northern and Southern interests. The two major political parties, the generally pro-industrialization Whigs and the generally pro-agriculture Democrats, started splitting among sectional lines and becoming less and less national in support as time went on.

In 1846, the country becomes involved in the Mexican-American War.(You can read about that on the preceding blog post.) Since it was possible that we'd get a lot of territory from winning, (which we did) slavery would most certainly have to be dealt with. The Wilmot Proviso was introduced the year the war started, and it proposed that slavery be banned in any new territory we got from Mexico all together. During this time, a new party called the Liberty Party came to being, and proposed to abolish slavery from the USA completely, though where it already existed, it would be done away with over time and its proponents would be restricted in their political activities. Since this was a pretty radical stance, the Free-Soil Party came about, which would just ban slavery in all the territories. In 1848 the war ended, and we got a bunch of land from Mexico. The Democrat Lewis Cass (who was running for President that year) proposed that popular sovereignty be used in determining whether or not new states would be slave or free. This idea basically would let the people of a state vote on whether or not they wanted it to allow slavery or not.



In 1850, an agreement was finally reached over what to do with the land gained from the war in the Mexican Cession. This was the Compromise of 1850. It drove tensions between North and South way up high, and people were predicting civil war, and "trying their damnedest" to stop it from happening. The South wanted territory open to slavery. Senator John C. Calhoun, a Southerner and slave owner, argued that Congress had no rights over people's property in the territories. Slaves were property, so they could be taken wherever their owners wished. Abolitionists strongly objected to this, as they always had. The North wanted to suppress slavery, and the South felt threatened and hemmed in by industrial interests from the North. New states could tip the balance of power in the government, so each side wanted more on their own side.


Texas became a slave state, and California became free. The Utah and New Mexico Territories both became open to popular sovereignty. A stronger fugitive slave law was also called for in the 1850 compromise, and it would be enforced. The North was ticked off that they would have to comply, and the South felt that the whole deal wasn't really fair and that this was their only concession. This compromise also repealed the Missouri Compromise, since it opened up land to potentially get slavery that would have been guaranteed slavery-free since it was above the 36th parallel.

In 1854 with the Kansas-Nebraska Act in which the states were opened to popular sovereignty (so that they could become states so a railroad could go through them), pro and anti-slavery forces clashed and created much violence and bloodshed, as well as political turmoil and pressure. It was pretty much a proxy war between anti-slavery North and pro-slavery South. In 1857 the Dred Scott Decision, by the Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney, repealed the Missouri Compromise decision (again) from 1820 and said that all territory was legally open to slavery. This case made many people in the North extremely angry, and tensions rose higher and higher. The Whig Party actually died because sectional tension tore it apart, and the Republican Party rose up, (they originally formed to protest the Kansas-Nebraska Act.) The Democratic Party was also weakened, but did not suffer the fate of the Whigs. In 1859, abolitionist John Brown, who had fought against pro-slavery people in Kansas earlier, took over an arsenal and tried to lead a raid on Virginia that was supposed to end with a mass-freeing of the slaves in the whole South. It failed, but the South became extremely disturbed...more so than it was already.



In 1860, Republican Abraham Lincoln becomes president, and the South is sure its fate is sealed, so they secede from the Union and form the Confederacy. The Civil War begins shortly after, and goes until 1865.

During the Civil War, African-Americans were used by the Union army (to a small extent, but they were distinguished!) but not by the Confederate Army. Early on, General Benjamin Butler ordered that all slaves be confiscated and not returned to their masters; they were now "contraband of war." He had the now former-slaves help work on fortifications for his troops. Later, the Congress would issue orders instructing that the whole Union army to do what Butler was doing, Fugitive Slave Law be damned. President Lincoln in 1863 then enacted the two part Emancipation Proclamation, which said that slaves in rebelling states were now free, voila! This got him lots of PR points, especially among already free African-Americans and former slaves.

When the Civil War ended in 1865, and the 13th Amendment went through Congress to outlaw slavery and involuntary servitude forever.This is the end of slavery in the USA, hoorah! What happens to the African-Americans, the South, and everyone else after 1865 will be covered in another blog post.

Thanks for reading! ^^

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Mexican-American War Timeline

Here I've made a quick timeline of the Mexican-American War in a nutshell, and I also mention of 1848 election just to put it into perspective.

Image from Encyclopaedia Britannica


- 1845 -

1) Texas is admitted as a state.
2) The border should be at the Nueces River, but Texans (and many Americans + Polk ) claim it should be at the Rio Grande
3) Polk sends Slidell to try and buy Texas up to the Rio Grande
3) Mexico refuses and gets angry
4) Polk sends troops down to the Nueces River to "defend" the Texans against angry Mexico

- Late 1845 into 1846 -
5) Polk lets troops go into California to assist in the Bear-Flag Revolt, in which California declares itself independent from Mexico
6) Mexico gets freaked out because of the troops in California, orders them to leave, which they do not

- 1846 -
8 ) Polk gets angry at Mexico for this and commands his forces to go past the Nueces and to the Rio Grande (which is Mexican/disputed territory)
9) Some Americans die
10) Polk gets angrier, says "American blood has been shed on American soil", his true motives can now be seen, there's controversy.
- many people say that Polk wasn't telling the truth because it wasn't American soil, Lincoln writes his Spot Resolution asking Polk to clarify himself on this, expresses doubt over the fact that it was in truth, American soil (which it wasn't)

- 1846 into 1847 -

11) War happens, there's more controversy,
- Thoreau refuses to pay his taxes to protest the war, gets thrown in jail and bailed out, it inspires him to write 'Civil Disobedience'
12) Wilmot Proviso in August, more controversy
- proposes banning slavery all together in any territory that would be gained from Mexico
13) America wins, gets Texas set up at the boundary of the Rio Grande

- Early 1848 -
14) The treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo gives America Texas to the Rio, New Mexico, California, ect.. (this is the Mexican Cession)
15) Polk gets angry at his ambassador Nicholas Trist for accepting those terms, because he wanted all of Mexico
16) Many tell him what an extraordinarily bad idea "all Mexico" would be
- senator John C. Calhoun opposes getting "all Mexico", as does Ralph Waldo Emerson and many Whigs
- reasons for not all Mexico include racism, and how there would be extreme difficulty in integrating the Mexican population with the US government/society (which wasn't gonna happen)
17) Polk gives in, abandons hopes to get all of Mexico
18) Expansion of slavery controversy increases

- Later in 1848 -
19) Election of 1848
20) Zachary Taylor from the Whig Party wins, beats Democrat Lewis Cass